Thursday, June 23, 2011

Bank of Canada's Carney warns of mounting risk, predicts bad quarter for economy

Julian Beltrame, The Canadian Press

OTTAWA - Strain from a world awash in debt is increasing the risk to what is already a fragile and weak economic recovery, the Bank of Canada warns.

And Canada faces a second, more immediate challenge from temporary factors such as disruptions from the Japanese earthquake and tsunami that will limit growth to about one per cent this quarter, governor Mark Carney added Wednesday.

"This is a disruptive time, there are a major series of changes going on ... so there will be some volatility," Carney told a Senate committee after his bank released its latest biennial Financial Systems Review.

The U.S. economy — which most Canadian exporters depend on — is a shadow of itself, he said, adding that U.S. households may need a decade to get out from debt.

Meanwhile, although emerging economies are booming, Canada's exporters, with the exception of commodities, are under-represented in that world.

And lastly, there's the mountain of debt weighing on the balance sheets of advanced countries, from Japan to parts of Europe to the U.S., that will dampen growth for years.

The summary put into stark language the findings of the central bank's financial systems review, released earlier in the morning, which took a more pessimistic view of the recovery.

The big problem facing the world is debt. Debt even threatens Canada's economy, given that household indebtedness is at record levels and could grow further before tailing off.

"The key risks to the stability of the Canadian financial system remain elevated and have edged higher since December," the bank concludes in the systems review.

For the first time, Carney revealed to a Senate committee that the current second quarter in Canada could see growth drop all the way to one per cent, from 3.9 per cent in the first three months.

Acknowledging that he had previously predicted growth of two per cent this quarter, which ends June 30, Carney told the senators: "The growth could be even lighter than that, it could be in the one per cent range."

He added, however, that he still expects the economy to do better in the second half of this year.

The bank report and Carney's testimony comes as Greece is again under the gun to hold off a credit default that would likely cripple some European banks and possibly touch off a new round of global financial jitters.

But the Bank of Canada says the debt woes extend further than Greece to other peripheral European nations — Spain, Portugal and Ireland — and over the longer term, to the U.S. and Japan .

Canada too faces a troubling household debt issue, the bank warns, which could be exacerbated by shocks, including an economic downturn and interest rate hikes.

In a separate report card, U.S. Federal Reserve officials also took a darker view of the situation, downgrading growth expectations both for the economy and job creation.

All these risks "are interconnected and mutually reinforcing," the Bank of Canada said.

Carney urged Canadians to keep things in perspective, however, growth is "reclining, not declining," and Canada still benefits from sound fundamentals.

Canada's financial system got a "healthy" grade both in terms of the soundness of the banking system and business balance sheets, but it is vulnerable somewhat to outside forces.

Carney said Canada's exposure to Europe's sovereign debt is small, but not insignificant, given the interconnectiveness of the international banking system.

"The Canadian financial system is not immune to the tensions that are currently affecting European markets," the bank's policy council says in the report.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has also expressed concern about the Greek crisis, urging European policy-makers to "create a firewall that would ensure that this type of issue would not spread beyond Greece."

Despite the weak recovery and the pain it will cause, governments have no choice but to start the process of getting their fiscal houses in order, said Carney.

He cautioned that indebted countries, even the U.S., shouldn't assume bond markets will be always be prepared to fill their credit needs at reasonable rates. Canada learned that lesson the hard way in the 1990s, he pointed out.

"Our experience in the mid-1990s is that the bond market is there and then it's not," he said.

Domestically, the bank is still very worried about Canadian household debt, which is at an all-time high of 147 per cent of disposable income.

The risk, it says, is that as household finances get squeezed, Canadians will have less money to spend on consumer goods, which would slow down economic growth.

"Further moderation in the pace of debt accumulation by households is needed to contain the buildup of this vulnerability," it says.

The bank also cites global imbalances, the two-speed recovery where advanced nations grow far slower than emerging economies, as additional risks that appear no closer to resolution.

"If the significant fragilities that still burden the financial system are not addressed in a timely manner, the progress achieved to date could be derailed," the bank said.

TD Bank economist Diana Petramala said the report suggests the Bank of Canada is very much in worry mode, and is unlikely to raise interest rates — which could weaken the economy — until 2012.

"All of these risks (cited by the central bank) could have significant economic consequences on Canada’s economy and financial system," if they are borne out, Petramala said.

"In addition, they are medium-term (rather than short-term) in nature, suggesting they are unlikely to disappear any time soon. Under our current forecast, we don’t anticipate Canada’s overnight rate to reach a more normal level of three per cent until 2013."

The bank last hiked interest rates last September , lifting its policy setting to one per cent, still exceptionally low by historical standards. http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/Bank-Canada-Carney-warns-capress-4229338819.html?x=0

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Regional Light Rail Transit Plan Passes

WATERLOO REGION — In six years, expect to see trains on city streets, carrying passengers to work, home and school.

In a historic decision, regional council voted 9-2 Wednesday to build an $818-million rail transit system, the largest public works project ever undertaken in the region.

Council believes the leap to rail transit will:

Persuade investors to build homes and workplaces in central neighbourhoods. It’s expected this will happen within 800 metres (walking distance) of stations.

Draw residents from their cars and reduce by $500 million the anticipated spending to expand roads.

Help curb suburban growth into green fields as the regional population swells to 729,000 by 2031, up from 544,000 today.

“This is a long-term vision of what our community will require to sustain itself,” Kitchener Mayor Carl Zehr said.

“I ask for our entire community to stop waiting for the future to happen. Instead, join us in creating it.”

“It is rare that an opportunity comes along that we can truly make a transformational decision,” said Coun. Sean Strickland of Waterloo. “It is time to seize the day. It is time to face the future with boldness and courage.”

“It can help to shape the look of our urban centres, to make them look more vibrant, more green,” said Coun. Jean Haalboom of Kitchener.

Critics fear trains will prove a costly blunder in a car-friendly community where commuters shun transit. Some critics argue rapid buses — at $702 million — are a cheaper, more flexible way forward.

“It is not what I believe our citizens want,” Waterloo Mayor Brenda Halloran said, in opposing trains. “Vision means different things to different people.”

Halloran said she was overwhelmed by public opposition to trains and their cost during the municipal election last October. She pledged then to oppose the plan and is sticking to her campaign promise.

“Right off the bat, we heard door after door after door, our citizens’ complete opposition to the light rail transit system,” Halloran said.

“That is the message that many of us heard while campaigning. What has happened to the voice of our citizens?”

“I stand alone for Cambridge,” Coun. Claudette Millar of Cambridge said, in voting against the $818 million plan. “It’s not that we want to be snippy. It’s the facts as we have heard them.”

About 140 people packed into council chambers to watch council approve trains. Most stood to applaud after the vote.

Observers have likened the rapid transit debate to the grand vision that launched the local expressway in the 1960s, also amid controversy and expense.

The approved plan and latest timeline suggests that by 2017 you will see electric trains, drawing power from overhead wires, running 19 kilometres between Conestoga Mall in Waterloo and Fairview Park mall in Kitchener.

The trains will run in dedicated lanes, displacing traffic. They will travel at the speed of traffic, averaging about 30 km/h, and will share signalized intersections with traffic. They will trigger green lights while cross-traffic waits.

Trains will pass every 7.5 to 15 minutes and stop at up to 18 platforms. Mall-to-mall travel time is estimated at 39 minutes, up to nine minutes faster than the schedule for express buses today. Fares are undetermined.

Trains will split onto separate streets in the downtowns of Kitchener and Waterloo, operating curbside rather than in the middle of the street.

From Kitchener, buses driving in mixed traffic will carry passengers 17 kilometres into Cambridge, linking to the Ainslie Street terminal. Buses will operate every 10 to 15 minutes and could begin to launch next year.

Cambridge is getting buses instead of trains because transit ridership is lower there, redevelopment potential is less, and rapid transit is being implemented in stages to save money.

Unlike trains, buses will not have dedicated lanes. Instead they will have features to bypass congestion, for example bypass shoulders on highways, special lanes to bypass queues at intersections, and the ability to trigger green lights.

Cambridge travel time is estimated at 33 minutes, up to two minutes faster than today’s scheduled express buses. There’s a new stop at Sportsworld Drive and a new route on Hespeler Road.

Council pledged to also launch trains in Cambridge in a later stage that has no funding or launch date. This delay has upset many in Cambridge.

“They feel very discouraged and disenfranchised,” Cambridge Coun. Nicholas Ermeta told councillors.

To pay for all this, council voted 10-1 to hike your regional property taxes by up to seven per cent, phased in over seven years.

An average home assessed at $254,000 will pay a total of $450 between 2012 and 2018. By 2018, property taxes will be up to $113 a year higher than today.

“I do not believe it to be an onerous amount,” Zehr said. “This is a reasonable figure.”

Waterloo’s Halloran opposed the tax increase.

The increase covers construction and operating costs for trains and expands Grand River Transit bus service by 25 per cent, to help feed suburban residents into central trains.

To ease costs, politicians have delayed the original plan to expand supportive buses by 60 per cent. This expansion will now happen after trains launch.

Senior governments are paying up to $565 million, leaving $253 million to local taxpayers.

To limit the tax increase, council has pledged to pay about one-third of increased costs out of current regional spending, drawing on paid-off mortgages and welfare costs soon to be assumed by provincial taxpayers.

To further limit tax increases, developers may be charged higher fees on new homes and buildings. This will require provincial approval.

Regional council will spend $10 million over 10 years on projects meant to help build transit ridership in Cambridge.

Council also voted 10-1 to review the proposed route in downtown Waterloo. Strickland and Coun. Jane Mitchell said they have heard concerns about trains using the intersection of King and Erb streets.

Halloran opposed the review, saying Waterloo council favours the route as proposed. “It came as a complete surprise to us,” she said about the route review.

Politicians have already spent $7 million to develop the rail proposal over nine bumpy years.

Council proposed trains in 2002. Senior governments refused funding but agreed to pay for more studies, leading to the proposal finally approved and funded Wednesday.

Four councillors declared conflicts of interest this year because they, their children or their employers own properties near stations, where land values are expected to rise.

Candidates stampeded away from rail transit costs in the municipal election last October, as residents trashed the plan on doorsteps.

After the election, politicians reconsidered buses, ordered more public consultation and rejected a late call for a referendum. The plan they approved is the same plan council approved in 2009, before funding was known.

Three councillors who voted for rail transit acknowledged they had been critical of the plan and its costs during the 2010 election.

They said they have since been persuaded to support trains, responding to planners, research and public support.

“I started putting it in perspective,” Woolwich Mayor Todd Cowan said.

“I think people have a better understanding of the whys and whats of LRT,” said Coun. Geoff Lorentz of Kitchener. “There is no question that the steps we will take tonight are the right ones.”

“I can support this,” Wilmot Mayor Les Armstrong said. “There is good work here.”

Council’s approval delighted Tim Mollison of the pro-rail Tri-Cities Transport Action Group.

“We’ve taken the first steps in changing how our community thinks about people who use transit,” he said. “It’s important that we continue to keep the pressure on regional council to follow through on the promises that they’ve made to Cambridge today.”

Leading technology, business and environmental organizations have endorsed trains. This includes Communitech, representing local technology firms, and the Greater Kitchener Waterloo Chamber of Commerce.

Cambridge council and the Cambridge Chamber of Commerce endorsed rapid buses, arguing this would be fairer because all three cities would get the same transit system right away.

Three scientific public opinion polls conducted this spring found the community divided over transit options, with 18 to 32 per cent of residents seeing no need for any rapid transit.

According to the polls, residents who favour rapid transit in principle lean more to trains than buses. However, residents are also concerned about the high cost of trains.

A poll by The Record found trains are more appealing to the young than the old, and more appealing to men than women.

Planners estimate trains will not launch before 2017. Between now and then, council has to conclude more studies, decide how the project will be built and by whom, formalize funding agreements with senior governments, sign contracts and order vehicles.

Politicians have not yet decided how deeply to involve private investors in the project.

Work to relocate or encase utilities beneath streets could launch by next year, to prevent ruptures and maintenance from disrupting transit. Track construction could launch by 2014.

jouthit@therecord.com

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

World debt will impact Canada as well, says Carney


OTTAWA — Canada’s fiscal advantage will only go so far in protecting the country against a debt crisis growing in the world’s advanced nations and Asia’s emerging economic powerhouses, Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney warns.

Trying out a theme he will likely take to Washington later this week, Carney told the Canadian Club of Ottawa on Monday that the world is in the midst of a major economic power shift and governments must prepare by getting their fiscal houses in order.

Advanced economies face a protracted period of slow growth as they struggle to come out from under a mountain of debt, while emerging economies such as China will face the opposite challenge of restraining inflation.

“In this environment, domestic macro stability is paramount,” he said in notes from the speech released prior to his address.

“Sustained fiscal adjustment is now required in most advanced economies. Debt-to-GDP (gross domestic product) in G7 countries is now the highest since the Second World War. The age of austerity is not a slogan but a timetable.”

The issue of debt in Europe and increasingly in the United States has become one of the key challenges for the global economy, both in the long and short terms.

Last week, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty took his concern about the U.S. debt situation to Washington, since what happens there has direct implications for Canada on everything from exports, to interest rates to the value of the loonie.

Carney said experience suggests when debt exceeds 90 per cent of GDP, economic growth will slow, and that is a situation facing most of Canada’s major trading partners, particularly the U.S.

Canada is one of the few advanced economies that is not in that position — debt to GDP is projected to start falling as both Ottawa and the provinces move to balanced budgets. But that doesn’t mean Canada won’t be sideswiped, as it was in the 2008 recession when a financial meltdown among other countries submarined Canadian exports, Carney said.

“Fiscal slippage by some major countries may increase interest rates for all,” he said. Moreover, if growth in the U.S. and Europe is slowed, Canadian exports will again feel the pain.

The governor gave no hint about his own long-term plans for interest rates in Canada, suggesting that he will not hike the policy rate on May 31.

The transformation in the world, with three quarters of growth coming from emerging markets, does present an opportunity for Canadians, Carney added, but so far the corporate sector has not taken full advantage of it. Emerging market growth has boosted demand for commodities, leading to higher prices that have stimulated production and investment in the Canadian sector, he notes.

But the corollary is that only 10 per cent of Canada’s exports go into these fast-expanding markets and taking commodities out of the equation, Canada’s exports share into these markets has been almost halved in the last decade.

“Increasing market share in emerging markets will require sustained efforts to develop trade, technical and academic partnerships,” he said. “In tandem, Canadian business needs to improve its competitiveness, source new suppliers and prepare to manage in a more volatile environment

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Why gas prices keep rising even when crude falls


Gasoline prices at the pump in Canada have climbed pretty much all winter, while in the United States they have risen for a remarkable 35 days straight, even as oil prices have see-sawed in recent weeks. Thedisconnect has enraged consumers, as they fork over nearly $4 (U.S.) a gallon or about $1.34 (Canadian) a litre to fill up their vehicles. Blame it on the crack spread, industry experts say.

“People automatically point to crude oil as the reason why the pump price has changed or should change,” said Michael Ervin, a petroleum industry consultant at Kent Marketing Services Ltd. But it’s not always the most important factor. “The increases we’re seeing now are entirely attributable to crack spreads,” he said.

What are crack spreads? The crack spread refers to the difference between the price of crude oil that refiners pay, versus the price of petroleum products such as gasoline that refiners produce and sell.

Why are crack spreads high now? It’s partly a seasonal issue. Demand for gasoline typically surges in the spring and summer, as drivers take to the roads more. The increased demand allows refineries to charge more for gasoline, even as oil prices remain relatively stable.

Which companies are benefiting? The big winners are the refining companies – those like Valero Energy Corp. that transform crude into useable products such as gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. Valero said that it expects a “strong second quarter,” as the company restarts some refineries and captures “outstanding margins” from the gap between sour crude prices and refined products. Canadian companies such as Suncor Energy Inc., and Imperial Oil, with refining arms complementing their oil production businesses, will also receive a boost. Profit tied to strictly to oil production, however, will be unaffected by what consumers pay to fill up their tanks because pump prices are not directly linked to oil prices.

Are there not ample supplies of gasoline? In the United States, draws on gasoline inventories were the highest in 13 years in early April and an unplanned outage at a refinery belonging to Sunoco Inc. in Philadelphia also dented gasoline supplies, according to a note published by UBS Securities. Four per cent of U.S. refining capacity was shut down in Texas City, Tex., including the country’s third-largest refinery. Operations belonging to BP PLC, Valero, and Marathon Oil Corp. have all been hit by power outages and some by subsequent fires, owing to rough weather. Wholesale gasoline prices in the Gulf Coast refined-products market then opened 5 cents (U.S) a gallon (3.78 litres) higher.

Can’t refiners just increase gasoline production? Yes, but that takes time and many have recently switched to the flourishing market for diesel fuel as an alternative. Refineries are selling a great deal of diesel, and new refineries are being tailored to produce the product as consumers shift to the greener fuel. Further, growing Third World economies are powered by diesel, and with demand for that fuel outstripping gasoline, the latter can be in short supply, said Ian MacGregor, chairman of North West Upgrading Inc., a company with plans to build a merchant upgrader that would turn bitumen from the oil sands into diesel fuel. “That’s a new restriction on gasoline supply,” he said.

What are politicians doing about high oil and gasoline prices?

U.S. President Barack Obama, facing discontent south of the border, wants to yank $4-billion in subsidies for energy companies, which are set to roll out rich first-quarter profits. In a letter to congressional leaders Tuesday, Mr. Obama said: “While there is no silver bullet to address rising gas prices in the short term, there are steps we can take to ensure the American people don’t fall victim to skyrocketing gas prices over the long term. One of those steps is to eliminate unwarranted tax breaks to the oil and gas industry and invest that revenue into clean energy to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.” http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/why-gas-prices-keep-rising-even-when-crude-falls/article1999870/

Have a great day! Roy

Monday, May 2, 2011

Rent or Buy? Do the Math

William Hanley, Financial Post · Apr. 28, 2011

A young couple who have been renting in our modest Toronto condo building recently bought a home a couple of miles away in a nice old neighbourhood with the aim of starting a family. The house is a big, detached fixer-upper and the renovation costs will be extensive.

In moving up to the rungs on the property ownership ladder, our young friends are committing themselves to a quantum leap in monthly expenses: They came up with a substantial down payment; they are taking on a mortgage payment, property tax bill and other expenses almost twice as large as their $1,600 rent; and they are spending a large amount on the renovation and other costs associated with buying a house.

It is a story that has unfolded millions of times in Canadian history and one that will continue to unfold because home ownership is deeply ingrained in our culture, a cornerstone of getting established and getting on our way in life. People will make great sacrifices and otherwise twist themselves out of financial and emotional shape to buy into the dream.

They willingly become what we used to call “house-poor,” paying well over the one-third of household income that many professionals believe should be the threshold.

Over the past decade, owning has been a financial success for most people, with prices rising almost in a straight line, with low, low interest rates feeding into the equation and with homeowners’ equity subsequently bounding higher.

And yet, if it has been just about as good as it gets for so long, perhaps conditions are going to deteriorate at least somewhat, with prices likely to stabilize or retreat a little and with interest rates set to rise modestly at least.

Our friends and other buyers this spring will know that Canadian house price gains have been flattening out. The Teranet-National Bank House Price Index for February published this week showed house prices gained just 0.1% from January for a 12-month gain of 3.8%. It was the eighth consecutive month of deteriorating gains.

While the forecast of a 25% drop in house prices over the next few years by one widely quoted economist seems far-fetched under present circumstances, a pattern of smaller gains likely signals a flat to slightly lower market.

So, is it time to revisit buying versus renting? For most of the 30% of Canadians who rent their accommodation it’s simply not an option. Getting their hands on a significant down payment and having the flexibility to meet higher payments if rates rise is difficult at best.

But some people with the wherewithal to buy a property might want to keep renting, keep saving and investing, and keep their options open. Other long-time owners might even want to consider selling and renting, thereby locking in their tax-free gains.

If you wish to see how the math works, visit Jeff Zabel’s Mortgage Alliance Website and the Rent vs. Buy Calculator website. Even your technodunce reporter could plug in some numbers and come away with worthwhile conclusions.

A two-bedroom condo in our building might sell for $400,000. Let’s say you have a $100,000 down payment, a mortgage rate of 4.5% over five years, a $672 monthly condo fee, $200 a month in property taxes and other expenses of, say, $100 month.

Let’s also say that a two-bedroom might rent for $1,600 a month in the building, other costs might total $100 a month and the rent might rise 2% a year over five years.

All other things considered, the purchased condo would have to appreciate 2.33% a year, selling at $441,571 to match the gain made by renting a similar property in the building and investing the difference in outgoings at a conservative 2.5% a year.

The other way around, an owner could sell for $400,000 — with net proceeds of about $375,000 — and rent for $1,600 a month. The $375,000 could pay a conservative net return of, say, $10,000 a year. That $1,600 a month plus $100 in expenses would add up to $20,400 a year.

But deduct the net investment return of $10,000 a year and the condo fees of $672 a month, property tax of $200 and other expenses of $100 (for $11,664 a year), and the monthly rent for the former owner is basically paid. Or the former owner could invest the $10,000 a year and still end up paying only about $728 a month more than he was when he was owning.

Of course, this is just the rough math, which doesn’t take into account other factors, such as pride of ownership, the sense of place and the strong probability of building equity.

But geez. If I could live in the building basically for what I’m paying now in fees, taxes and insurance (by deploying my $10,000 a year investing return), and have my $375,000 to “invest” in winters in Waikiki and nice overnighters in Niagara-on-the-Lake, well then ….

It’s a thought, but only that. They’ll probably carry me out of here feet first from our condo, the equity in which may one day be needed to help us out in one of the emergency situations that can arise in older age.

Meantime, it wouldn’t hurt for everyone to do some math and determine what’s best financially for them — renting versus buying. And then, of course, throw the math out the window and succumb to the emotional tug of home and hearth.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

The Thrill of Buying a Home!

William Hanley, Financial Post · Apr. 21, 2011

You walk into the open house, take one look and say to yourself: This is it. It’s the house I have to live in. Where do I pay? A bidding war? I’m in.

Over my years of buying houses, I never bought one that did not have that frisson moment, that thrill of finding a place so suited to my wants. Indeed, I have in the past decided that I wanted to buy a house in what seems, in retrospect, to be nanoseconds. (By contrast, I’ve taken weeks to decide on the right pair of shoes.)

It is no way to make an “investment,” to be sure. But, as I’ve previously discussed in this space, buying a house is perhaps the most uninvestment-like of investments.

Just about anyone who’s purchased a property or thought about purchasing knows that it is much about gut-feel, in which the senses can conspire to trump sense.

Now, as the major real estate selling season gets under way, along comes a survey commissioned by BMO Bank of Montreal to give statistical weight to the notion that intuition carries a particularly heavy weight in the house-buying process.

The survey by Leger Marketing found that more than two-thirds of Canadians cited a “good feeling” toward the property as a reason to buy. Meantime, though, good sense is not thrown out of that gorgeous bay window and into those manicured flower beds. More than 90% of house-hunters value affordability and location over resale value.

So, the axiom that there are three important things in real estate – location, location and location – might reasonably be replaced by the Three Ps: Price, place and personality.

Nevertheless, that resale value is not a big concern to these surveyed house-hunters – people between 25 and 45 who plan to buy a home within two years – is a telling sign of the real estate times.

With some dips here and there, Canadian house prices have been rising strongly for more than a decade. Indeed, even the recession created just a downward blip in the chart of ever-growing values, with the average national price rising 8.9% last month from the previous March (but just 4.3% excluding Vancouver).

As a result, most of the house-hunters surveyed might never have been aware of a housing market that was not rising. I suspect many in this 25-to-45 demographic believe house prices basically keep going up forever, that though they downplay resale value in the survey, the expectation for solid gains is, well, a given. (Any significant drop in prices would surely shake that belief.)

In recent times, investors have been asked if they are stocks or bonds. If you’re a stock, you are prepared to take on more investment risk. If you’re a bond, you are not.

Perhaps, though, many people are probably houses when it comes to investing. A home is both partly a stock and a bond – and somehow neither.

It is a bond because over the long term it will likely produce modest returns through the enforced savings required by paying down the mortgage. It is a stock because the gains could be outsized if the investor were to buy and sell at propitious entry and exit points for market-timing gains.

And it is neither because it is an “investment” with many moving parts and frictional costs. You don’t live in a stock or a bond, but when the house leaks, it costs money and cuts into the investment. Meantime, the costs associated with buying and selling a property are becoming more daunting in many jurisdictions, with some observers reckoning that a house is often a mediocre investment at best.

But most young first-time buyers and mover-uppers are not fazed by such commentary. Home ownership is a cornerstone of our culture, with 70% of the population owning properties and many of the other 30% looking to join the majority.

And the real estate industry has become far more adept at marketing and selling than in the days decades ago when I was in the market. Today, houses are often professionally “staged” to produce that frisson moment. Prices are sometimes set artificially low to produce that exciting bidding war and that extra frisson of “winning.”

A house, it is said, is not a home. And a home is not strictly an investment. But does a stock have granite counters? Does a bond have stainless steel appliances?http://www.financialpost.com/personal-finance/thrill+buying+house/4655339/story.html

Monday, April 25, 2011

ACTION ALERT: WATERLOO RESIDENTIAL RENTAL HOUSING BYLAW

Background and details available on the City’s website:www.city.waterloo.on.ca/rhlr

On May 9, 2011, Council will hear delegations on the issue and consider the revised residential rental housing licensing bylaw.

ISSUE

The City of Waterloo is proposing a citywide Rental Housing License Bylaw (RHLB), whereby homeowners and low-rise residential property owners would require a license to rent out some or all of their property. The licenses are costly, and homes containing more than three bedrooms will not be eligible to obtain a rental license that reflects the actual number of bedrooms in the home, because a 3 bedroom limit will apply in most cases.

The fact that the bedroom limit remains in the revised RHLB is particularly disconcerting considering that the Ontario Human Rights Commission continues to cite this as a concern. We absolutely concur with their opinion, as there is no consideration given for the scenario where a family needing more than 3 bedrooms simply chooses to rent a home within the environs of the City of Waterloo.

CONCERNS

  • Families will be forced to look to communities with less restrictive barriers on the type of housing that can be rented.
  • Homeowners with homes containing more than three bedrooms will not be eligible to obtain a rental license that reflects the actual number of bedrooms in the home.
  • Executives and employees of the City’s “keystone” companies will be restricted to populating a maximum of 3 bedrooms in any home they rent regardless of the actual number of bedrooms, or more likely, excluded from living in Waterloo altogether.
  • The creation of the RHLP will require a “significant investment of staff and financial resources.”
  • Landlords will increase rents proportionate to their costs, and these costs will be passed down to renters.

REALTOR® PROPOSAL

KWAR is urging the City to remove the bedroom limit from the proposed rental housing licensing bylaw. With the increased enforcement the RHLB provides, the City will have the tools it needs to enforce its goals of tenant health and safety, and property standards compliance, making the three bedroom limit unnecessary.

With the ability to better enforce the program because of its widened scope, the requirements for additional staff should be carefully considered–the current fee structure for the licenses and renewals as proposed is costly.

WHAT WE’VE SAID…

HAVE YOUR SAY…

You can use the applicable form letter and email contacts listed below.

As a REALTOR® serving clients and customers in the city of Waterloo I am troubled by the 3 bedroom limit in the proposed residential rental licensing bylaw. Please consider the concerns that have been raised on this matter by the Ontario Human Rights Commission and the Kitchener-Waterloo Association of REALTORS®.

As a Waterloo homeowner I am concerned with the limitation that will placed on how I use my property should the 3 bedroom limit remain in the City’s proposed residential rental licensing bylaw. Please consider the concerns that have been raised on this matter by the Ontario Human Rights Commission and the Kitchener-Waterloo Association of REALTORS®.

DON’T KNOW WHO YOUR COUNCILLOR IS? FIND OUT HERE.

Help spread the word by sharing this:
Share

Friday, April 15, 2011

After temporary growth spurt, Canadian economy is slowing, says Bank of Canada

OTTAWA – The Canadian economy likely expanded by a surprisingly strong 4.2 per cent in the first three months of the year, but it was a temporary burst of activity that is already over, the Bank of Canada says in its new outlook.

The central bank’s new quarterly outlook paints a picture of an economy that is settling down to a protracted period of slow growth, being held back by a high loonie, a tapped-out consumer and government spending restraint.

The bank says the current second quarter will see growth brake to two per cent, less than half what it was in the first, in part because of supply disruptions to Canada’s auto sector caused by the Japanese earthquake and tsunami. The disruption will lessen going forward, however.

On an annual basis, the economy is forecast to slow from 2.9 per cent this year, to 2.6 per cent next year and 2.1 per cent in 2013.

The overall take from the document is that the bank appears in no hurry to start raising interest rates to slow the economy because other factors are doing the job.

The bank doesn’t appear to be overly worried that high oil and food prices might trigger inflation. It briefly notes that inflation may hit three per cent, at the upper end of the bank’s acceptable range, in the next few months, but appears unconcerned.

“The combination of modest growth in labour compensation (wages) and higher productivity is expected to continue to dampen inflationary pressures, with the higher assumed value of the Canadian dollar providing further restraint,” the bank said.

Economists had been pointing to either May or July as the most likely dates for the bank to start raising its policy rate from the current one per cent, which would have the effect of also raising short-term interest rates for such things as variable mortgages.

But the dovish tone of the latest outlook suggests interest rates could remain low longer, especially amid fears that moving aggressively in advance of the United States likely would have the undesired effect of lifting the loonie even higher.

The bank does concede that it has been taken by surprise by the 3.3 per cent expansion in the fourth quarter of 2010, and the likely even stronger 4.2 per cent spurt in the first three months of this year.

That means Canada’s economy will likely return to full capacity by the middle of next year, earlier than previously expected.

But it stresses temporary factors were responsible, including stronger exports and domestic consumption, and that there is still plenty of slack in the economy.

The exports surge is already over, the bank says, and the persistently strong dollar averaging $1.03 US will continue to restrain exports going forward.

“The bank continues to project ... that the recovery in exports will be subdued relative to earlier global recoveries, with the higher level of the Canadian dollar assumed in this projection adding to long-standing competitive challenges,” it said.

Consumption may remain moderately stronger than would be assumed, the bank says, in part because high commodity prices are increasing household purchasing power through gains in the terms of trade, the difference between export and import prices. It estimates the country’s gross domestic income will rise by 4.7 this year.

Still, it believes the housing market will continue to cool and that government spending restraint will be a net drag on the economy this year.

The biggest engine of growth remains business investment, it says, in part because the higher Canadian dollar makes investment in foreign-made machinery and equipment less expensive.

Globally, the bank sees little change in the economic outlook, although it continues to stress risk factors such as high debt both among households and governments in the advanced economies, the Japanese crisis, turmoil in the Middle East and high commodity prices, especially oil.

Despite the risks, it says the global recovery is becoming more rooted and that even growth in troubled Europe is strengthening.

“The global economic recovery is projected to proceed at a steady pace over 2011-13,” the bank says, projecting growth of 4.1 per cent this year and 3.9 per cent next.

The bank has slightly lowered its forecast for U.S. growth this year to three per cent, from its previous 3.3 per cent call four months ago.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

First Quarter Results for Kitchener Waterloo MLS Housing Sales

News Release
540 Riverbend Drive, Kitchener, Ontario, N2K 3S2
Telephone: 519-576-1400
Facsimile: 519-741-5364
Website: www.kwar.ca
KITCHENER-WATERLOO’S REALTORS® POST SOLID HOME SALES IN MARCH
KITCHENER-WATERLOO, ON (April 5, 2011) –Sales of residential properties via the Multiple Listing
System (MLS®) of the Kitchener-Waterloo Association of REALTORS® (KWAR) ran slightly above the fiveyear average for the first quarter.
During the first quarter of 2011, there were a total of 1474 home sales, 10.4 percent below last year’s
record for the same period.
“Residential real estate sales in the area continue to perform well,” says George Patton, President of
KWAR. “We’ve not set any records yet this year, but a stable market is a good market.”
Home sales for the month of March totalled 608 units, 15.4 percent lower than the same month a year
ago —also a record breaking period. Of those sales, there were 385 single detached homes, 116
condominium units, 61 semi-detached and 40 freehold townhouses.
Patton says he is paying attention to see what effect the recent mortgage rate increases by several of
Canada’s big banks will mean for the typically busy spring real estate market. “By historical standards,
mortgage rates are still pretty low,” he said. “With the economy continuing to strengthen, the housing
market should stay balanced.”
While the most popular price range selling in March of last year was in the $225,000 to $250,000
category, making up 16.7% of the residential market, this month’s sales activity shifted to the higher
price ranges, with nearly 15% of sales occurring in the $300,000 to $350,000 price range.
This has pushed the average sales price for all residential properties in the month of March up 5.4% to
$298,671 compared with the same month a year ago. However, on a year-to-date basis, the average sale
price has increased more gradually with a one percent increase to $290,148 relative to last year.
The KWAR cautions that average sale price information can be useful in establishing long term trends,
but should not be used as an indicator that specific properties have increased or decreased in value.
Those requiring specific information on property values should contact a REALTOR®.
For Comment: George Patton, President, 519-578-7300
For Background: Tania Benninger, Communication Manager, 519-576-1400 ext. 227
Established in 1937, the Kitchener-Waterloo Association of REALTORS® (KWAR) operates the local Multiple Listing
Service® (MLS®) and provides ongoing professional education courses for nearly 1,200 REALTOR® members who
serve the communities of Kitchener-Waterloo and outlying areas. The term REALTOR® is a trademark identifying
members in good standing of the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) who provide real estate brokerage
services in compliance with CREA’s By-Laws and Rules, the REALTOR® Code, and all applicable federal and
provincial laws and regulations. The MLS® System of the KWAR is operated in association with the MLS® Marks
owned by CREA. An MLS® System includes an inventory of listings of participating REALTORS®, and ensures a
certain level of accuracy of information, professionalism and co-operation amongst REALTORS® to affect the
purchase and sale of real estate. Residential Sale Price and Total Units Sold in March Over the last 10 years:
Units Sold K-W Only Sales All Area Sales
K-W Only
Sales
All Area
Sales
Average
Price
Median
Price
Average
Price
Median
Price
2002 435 514 $172,077 $159,500 $174,142 $159,950
2003 389 459 $182,687 $168,000 $184,970 $168,000
2004 549 654 $199,165 $184,900 $198,673 $184,700
2005 491 587 $213,734 $198,000 $218,845 $202,000
2006 482 594 $227,752 $214,000 $238,411 $215,250
2007 508 610 $243,090 $225,000 $249,609 $227,100
2008 470 595 $256,744 $240,000 $259,355 $240,500
2009 397 487 $256,991 $242,000 $257,151 $240,500
2010 546 719 $281,316 $255,000 $283,374 $255,000
2011 459 608 $292,844 $264,250 $298,671 $268,500
Definitions:
K-W Only= MLS® transactions through the KWAR within the cities of Kitchener and Waterloo.
All Area= K-W Only plus the townships of Woolwich, Wellesley, Wilmot and any out-of-jurisdiction sales sold through KWAR.
The use of average price information can be useful in establishing long term trends, but does not indicate actual
prices in centres comprised of widely divergent neighbourhoods or account for price differential between
geographic areas. Statistical information contained in this report includes all housing types. Those requiring
specific information on property values should contact a REALTOR®. Residential Sale Price and Total Units Sold Year-To-Date for the last 10 years:
Units Sold K-W Only Sales All Area Sales
K-W Only
Sales
All Area
Sales
Average
Price
Median
Price
Average
Price
Median
Price
2002 1,147 1,349 $169,747 $156,600 $171,836 $156,000
2003 1,022 1,209 $183,371 $169,000 $185,703 $169,600
2004 1,140 1,360 $198,274 $185,000 $199,704 $185,000
2005 1,144 1,379 $211,266 $194,000 $215,207 $195,500
2006 1,203 1,481 $225,277 $210,000 $232,266 $214,000
2007 1,245 1,492 $238,546 $222,000 $244,350 $225,000
2008 1,173 1,465 $257,225 $239,900 $261,760 $241,500
2009 895 1,093 $253,275 $236,900 $255,281 $238,000
2010 1,225 1,645 $281,495 $255,000 $287,388 $259,000
2011 1,108 1,474 $286,596 $262,000 $290,148 $265,000
Source: Kitchener-Waterloo Association of REALTORS®
REALTORS® know real estate.
howrealtorshelp.ca | www.realtor.ca | www.icx.ca | www.kw.openhouses.ca | www.kwar.ca

Friday, March 25, 2011

Home-buying help in your pocket

Jameson Berkow, Financial Post

Mobile apps can be used for just about anything these days. From remotely starting a car to filming and editing entire feature-length films using a smartphone, there are even apps out there to help buy, sell or renovate a home.

With spring officially arriving on Monday, the busiest time of year for the real estate industry is now here. According to the Canadian Real Estate Association, the majority of deals to buy or sell a home will occur in the next few months. To help buyers and sellers stay on top of their own efforts without having to stay on top of their home computer, Financial Post technology reporter Jameson Berkow found some of the more useful real estate apps for Canadian house hunters.

REAL ESTATE DICTIONARY

Hypothecate is when someone offers their property as collateral when taking on a debt, such as a mortgage, but the average person would never know that. Particularly useful for those looking to buy or sell a home without using a real estate agent, there are a number of dictionary apps available on every smartphone platform to help users make sense of all the industry jargon. The Glossary of Real Estate Terms, complete with 700 key definitions, is available for the Google Android platform at a cost of $2 and the Dictionary of Real Estate Terms is available on the Apple iOS platform also for about $2. Anyone who has ever been confounded by the term "estoppel" will find one of these apps to be well worth the price.

REALTOR.CA

The official mobile app of the Canadian Real Estate Association, this free app gives users access to an average of 350,000 Canadian properties for sale on the Realtor.ca website. Using a smartphone's built-in GPS feature, the app lets users search for houses available near their current location or a specific address, providing them with photos, listing details and contact information to get in touch with the agent. It launched on Microsoft Corp.'s Windows Phone 7 platform last November and a version compatible with Apple Inc.'s iPhone, iPad and iPod touch devices was released in late December; with other versions for Research in Motion Ltd.'s BlackBerry OS and Google Inc.'s Android expected in the next few months. More than 100,000 people have already downloaded this well-designed app.

ZOOCASA

This free app, currently available only on the iPhone platform, is similar to Realtor.ca but even more intuitive. For those Apple device users who don't mind using something other than the "official" industry app, Zoocasa will also let users search for properties based on their current location, even displaying full descriptions of properties that would appear on the Zoocasa website. There is also a unique social function built in, allowing users to email listings from directly within the app.

MOVETOOLS

Once the deal has been made and the title transferred, the physical labour can begin. That is where the new MoveTools app specifically designed for the Apple iPad tablet, released by insurance provider State Farm in early March, definitely comes in handy. Users can use this app to customize a weekly moving checklist. Waiting to pack the printer last would also be a good idea, as this app also lets users create and print "smart labels" with digital QR codes, which can be read by any smartphone with a barcode scanning application to display what each smart-labelled box contains.

DREAM HOME

Even after the buying and the physical moving is done, a new home still needs to be adapted -either through major renovations or minor redecorations -to suit the new owner's unique tastes. The Dream Home app for iPhone, as well as the Dream Home HD app for the iPad, brings an element of fun to the process. Users can snap photos with their device's camera and share them with other users of this $5 app to gain inspiration for their new dwelling. With content arranged by room type, colour and style and new content added regularly, users can find the new style to match their new abode.